Independent agents say they represent the best interests of the insured (even though in a legal sense, the agent is the representative of the insurer), while technically, brokers are supposed to represent the interests of the buyer–period. If either breed of producer accepts contingent commissions from an insurer, a potential conflict of interest is created.

For this column, we asked readers how to reconcile the inherent conflicts of contingent commission deals with a producer's ethical obligations to consumers.

One self-described "consumerist" sent a long quotation from an agent association Web page, discussing the advantages of using an independent agent–including labeling the agent as "a value hunter" offering "one-stop shopping" who will review coverage and update insurance as the buyer's consultant.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.