A federal district court judge affirmed an earlier decision that a suit brought by Mississippi's attorney general against insurers for flood losses stemming from Hurricane Katrina should be heard in state court, where carriers perceive they will be at a disadvantage.

U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, L.T. Senter Jr., sitting in Jackson, Miss., ruled on Tuesday that a March decision by U.S. District Court Judge Tom S. Lee was correct in ordering that a suit brought on flood claims is a state issue and belongs in the state court.

The suit, brought by Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood against five insurers, seeks to force the carriers to cover losses from Hurricane Katrina. The attorney general argues that despite the flood exclusion in the policies, insurers should pay claims because the water was wind-driven, which is a covered occurrence.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.