While it is rare for the property-casualty insurance industry to mount a united front on almost any controversy, conflict within the business was particularly harsh this year on a number of major public policy debates, including the split over a long-term response to catastrophe threats, an optional federal charter and the call to get rid of contingency fees. See NU Editor In Chief Sam Friedman's take and offer your own on Sam's blog at www.property-casualty.com.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
