"It is a bit too early to know the full extent of the seizures," noted Mr. Schwartz. "We do not know if any compensation has been offered, or if they will renegotiate the contracts."

There still could be violations of international law, depending on the negotiating process, but ultimately "it is clear that this is not good for underwriters with exposures there," he said.

Mr. Schwartz explained that underwriters would be subject to a claim if the properties are confiscated with inadequate or no compensation. However, he speculated that PetroBras, which is government owned, probably does not have insurance coverage against such losses.

Latin America has a long-standing history of corporate property confiscation, Mr. Schwartz noted--an event considered low frequency, but high severity.

In terms of economic risk coverage, he said this incident appears to be part of a cycle in Latin America. Some governments appear to be shifting from privatization back to government intervention and ownership. Ecuador is cited as another Latin America country that may make a strong left turn, he noted.

However, because many governments in Latin America have pursued private investing to build their economies, risk managers have been more interested in securing insurance to cover other risks such as terrorism and supply interruption, while confiscation cover has been on the decline. At least when it comes to Latin America, there may be some purchasing shifts, he said.

"Risk managers in a company are working with a premium pool that allows them 'X' amount to purchase," said Mr. Schwartz. "Economic risk purchase is considered discretionary coverage, and they have to carefully consider where it is best spent."