A Connecticut judge has granted class-action status to a lawsuit accusing Travelers Property Casualty of violating the state's unfair trade practices act when dealing with claimants who agree to structured settlements. The suit also alleges civil conspiracy, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment.
The lead plaintiff, Lisa Macomber, is a Travelers policyholder who suffered an automobile accident during the late 1980s in Connecticut and had settled a personal-injury claim with the insurer for $70,000 in cash, plus a structured payout of a $1,000 a year for life with a 30-year guaranty. Her complaint alleges that Travelers routinely spent less on the purchase of annuities than it had agreed to spend in settlements, and that the brokers involved in the annuity transactions, including Travelers Equity Sales and Salomon Smith Barney Holdings, routinely paid up to 50 percent of their commissions to Travelers Property Casualty. These practices allowed Travelers to overstate the actual dollar amounts it used to fund structured settlements, the suit contends.
Originally, Macomber's suit was filed in federal court. After the judge dismissed federal claims, declining jurisdiction over state claims, the suit was refiled in state court in 1999. Those eligible to participate in the class action must have settled claims against Travelers Property Casualty since 1982 through structured settlements that involved such activities.
“We are in the process of trying to figure out the exact number and are in the process of identifying those people from around the country,” said Ralph Stone, Macomber's attorney. “We are pleased with the court's careful analysis of the class certification issue, and we look forward to further prosecuting this important case on behalf of the class.”
Although Marlene Ibsen, a spokesperson for Travelers, declined to discuss the details of the suit, she said that the company believes Macomber's case lacks merit. “In terms of our perspective on the ruling [on class-action status], we respectfully disagree with the judge's ruling,” she said. “We continue to believe that the allegations made by the plaintiff in the case are without merit.”
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.