A new study of the reinsurance industry's Jan. 1 renewal period finds U.S. insurers paying significant increases as reinsurers seek to separate U.S. carriers' risks from exposures in Europe.

Guy Carpenter & Company Inc., a subsidiary of the Marsh & McLennan Companies, has published "Property Specialty Update--1 January 2006 Renewal Season Overview," an in-depth report on the Jan. 1 property renewal season.

The study expands on the property findings of Guy Carpenter's recently published "U.S. Reinsurance Renewals at Jan. 1," providing a detailed assessment of reinsurance renewals in Europe, Asia Pacific and the U.S.

Also covered in the report are property catastrophe, property risk excess of loss, proportional treaty, retrocession, rating agencies and modeling, catastrophe bonds, and new market capital.

Among the study's highlights:

o Property catastrophe: Preliminary estimates show prices rising for the first time in two years, to mid-1990s levels, with massive increases on some U.S. renewals. A reassessment of rating agency capital requirements, readjustment of catastrophe models and the rising cost of capital influenced pricing decisions, although there was no shortage of capacity.

o Risk Excess of Loss: Pricing changes in the per risk market, where reinsurers assume claims payment above what the primary insurer assumes, were less substantial. However, a number of reinsurers did seek to limit the amount of catastrophe limit provided on per risk treaties, with others excluding critical catastrophe in the renewal of worldwide risk excess of loss treaties.

o Pro Rata: For most reinsurers, the spreading of a percentage of a single risk among them remained a less attractive line of business than excess of loss. In terms of both the number of participants and capacity, this segment of the market was relatively stable in 2005.

o Retrocession: Retrocession programs with U.S. exposures generally experienced a total loss in 2005. Consequently, Jan. 1 renewals saw limited capacity and price increases in the region of 100 percent. Reinsurers also sought to separate U.S. and non-U.S. coverages.

o Rating Agencies: In the wake of the 2005 hurricane season, rating agencies immediately downgraded a number of reinsurers. They have since been aggressive in instituting stricter capital adequacy requirements and new measurement standards for catastrophic risk.

o New Market Entrants: In reaction to the 2005 losses, $8.5 billion of new capital entered the market, anticipating rising reinsurance rates. Though they did not play a major role at the time of the January 1, 2006 renewals, these new reinsurers are expected be a more significant factor later in 2006.

o Catastrophe Bonds and Alternative Risk Transfer: A record amount of nearly $2 billion of catastrophe bonds were issued in 2005, and this segment should continue to thrive in 2006. Meanwhile, the market for structured risk products remains challenging, with accounting and regulatory issues troubling buyers and sellers.

The report is online at www.guycarp.com.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.