Washington--Did a judge who took a huge contribution from State Farm act properly when he voted on a judicial panel to toss out a billion-dollar verdict against the insurer?
Plaintiffs in the billion-dollar State Farm aftermarket parts case are asking that question in papers requesting the U.S. Supreme Court review the decision of the Illinois Supreme Court to throw out the award against the company.
State Farm was accused in the case of improperly requiring the use of inferior generic parts rather than original manufacturer's equipment for repair of policyholders' damaged vehicles.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
