The Securities and Exchange Commission is probing the relationship between Marsh & McLennan and two of its subsidiaries on referral business and compensation for the referrals.
As part of a 10-Q filing yesterday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, New York-based professional services firm MMC said the Boston Office of the SEC is "conducting an informal investigation of a former program" where companies within the MMC group referred business to one another and received compensation for such referrals. The queries involve MMC, its consulting firm Mercer, and its investment arm Putnam.
MMC said it is fully cooperating in the investigation.
The revelation was one of a number of regulatory situations MMC listed in its recent 10-Q filing. The company is involved in numerous legal, regulatory and civil matters involving not only Mercer and Putnam, but its insurance brokerage firm Marsh.
MMC reached a settlement with New York Attorney Eliot Spitzer at the beginning of this year over allegations that executives at Marsh engaged in bid-rigging and steering insurance policy placements in return for kickbacks in the form of profitable contingent fee arrangements based on volume placements.
There are more than 60 civil actions detailed in the filing against MMC and Marsh involving policyholders, states, or shareholders.
Complaints with the law suits range from charges the company violated the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, to violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, to derivative actions and securities frauds, and other actions. There are two actions pending in Canada.
Putnam reached a finalized settlement this year over SEC charges that executives engaged in excessive short-term trading of mutual funds.
The investment arm is still involved in a number of investigations by the SEC, federal, and state authorities, into other aspects of its investing actions, according to the filing. MMC and Putnam have been named in a number of class action civil suits brought in the name of all investors and separate actions by shareholders. The company said it has been informed that more actions are pending.
State and federal authorities have also asked Mercer for information on services it provided.
MMC said these actions do not include other legal claims and lawsuits in "the ordinary course of business" that would involve primarily errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.