Mr. Wood said the vote was unlikely to have any impact on the congressional committee's decision whether to act or not act on SMART.

Rep. Oxley and Rep. Richard Baker, R-La., chairman of the panel's key Capital Markets Subcommittee, are on track to release a new draft of the bill sometime this summer, according to industry lobbyists.

It is unclear what the full Ohio Legislature will do with the draft resolution, but it would appear to give Rep. Oxley pause, given that even a representative from his own district, Derrick Seaver, representing Minter in Rep. Oxley's 4th District, is a sponsor of the resolution.

The committee is currently working with industry trade groups and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), asking for input title by title, in hopes of creating a consensus on the bill. A letter prepared by the staff of the NAIC providing a detailed critique of the bill was apparently forwarded to the committee staffers late last month, but has not yet become available.

The resolution states that, "State Legislatures are more responsive to the needs of their constituents and more knowledgeable regarding the market conditions in their own states and the necessary insurance products and regulations to meet those market conditions."

According to the resolution, premium levies in Ohio totaled $404 million in 2003, and it contended that the proposed federal law "would undermine state sovereignty, threaten the power of state legislatures, governors, insurance commissioners and attorneys general to oversee, regulate and investigate the insurance industry ..."

It also said the SMART bill would "limit the states' ability to protect the interests of their constituents ..."

Defending Reps. Oxley and Baker's efforts, Mr. Wood said that "state legislators want to preserve turf should not come as a surprise to anybody."

But he said the Ohio panel is "very, very misguided if they think that the proposed SMART Act is destructive to state insurance regulation--precisely the opposite is true."

Mr. Wood said that, "Ohio's former insurance director, and former president of the NAIC, Lee Covington, agrees with Mike Oxley on this point. He understands insurance regulation and the challenges facing it, and he understands that there are simply many areas of state-by-state insurance law that are totally at cross-purposes with the national and international nature of the insurance marketplace.

"The paradox is that there are many players who think that the SMART Act doesn't go nearly far enough--that Congress should enact federal regulation to supplant state regulation," Mr. Wood said.

In addition to the Ohio action, New York State Senator William J. Larkin, R-New Windsor, with the support of the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) has sent Mr. Oxley's committee a detailed critique of SMART, suggesting it would cripple insurance regulation by taking revenues from the states that they currently use for staff to oversee the industry.