P-C Trade Groups Oppose Re Collateral Rule Revamp
By Steve Tuckey
NU Online News Service, Jan. 12, 4:12 p.m. EST?Industry representatives have asked regulators to disband an ad hoc committee set up last year to look into the alien reinsurance collateralization issue and return it to the regular National Association of Insurance Commissioners framework.[@@]
In a letter to New York Insurance Superintendent Greg Serio, the chairman of the group, trade association representatives asserted that the composition of the ad hoc group was "fundamentally flawed."
"Many attempts to open the roundtable to be more inclusive and representative were rebuffed," the letter stated. "In recognition of the fact that the roundtable represented only a small, select portion of the industry, and that even this select portion of the industry was unable to reach a consensus, it seems appropriate at this time to move any future discussions to the NAIC Reinsurance Task Force to allow all interested parties an opportunity to fashion a solution."
For several years representatives of alien non-U.S. reinsurers have sought to relax the 100 percent collateralization rule for those companies who have proved their credit worthiness.
But they have been opposed by the domestic primary and secondary insurance sectors who feel such a relaxation would pose solvency threats and ultimately jeopardize policyholders in the event of financial failure.
Last November an ad hoc group that for the past several months had been attempting to reach a compromise came up with one that would overhaul all reinsurance regulation to focus on all companies regardless of country of origin.
In Monday's letter, the trade groups said that since the alien companies had not yet met concerns about enforcing judgments and international accounting standards that lack uniformity, the time was not ripe for such a drastic overhaul of current regulation.
Mr. Serio is set to leave office next week. Ad hoc group member and North Dakota Commissioner Jim Poolman said the thrust of the trades' letter was unfortunate.
"I find it unfortunate that since we couldn't come up with a quick consensus between the foreign and domestic insurers that they just want us to stop our work," he said. "We knew this was not going to be easy and we don't think we should stop our work just because one side or the other did not get their way."
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.