Halliburton Settles Asbestos Claims With Insurers
By Mark E. Ruquet
NU Online News Service, May 11, 3:04 p.m. EDT?Halliburton said it would receive a total of $1.6 billion from insurers toward the settlement of its asbestos claims litigation, if approved by a federal bankruptcy court.[@@]
The Dallas-based provider of services to the petroleum and energy industry announced yesterday a proposed settlement of its claims to cover a proposed $2.78 billion trust fund settlement with litigants over asbestos and silica claims.
"I am pleased that we have reached these significant milestones toward resolving our asbestos liability," said Dave Lesar, chairman, president and chief executive officer of Halliburton, in a statement.
Mr. Lesar said the settlements, "if consummated, will resolve disputes between us and our carriers, forestall further appeals, and allow the bankruptcy proceedings to be completed expeditiously."
The suits were filed against DII Industries, Kellogg Brown & Root, and other subsidiaries of Halliburton. The companies are currently in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The plan must be approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The agreement would include the $575 million settlement with Equitas, the Lloyd's of London reinsurer set up to handle asbestos claims, that was announced in January.
In December of last year, several insurers, led by ACE U.S.A., based in Philadelphia, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., a subsidiary of Hartford, Conn.-based The Hartford Financial Services Group, sought to have the prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings vacated. The companies claimed Halliburton was misusing the proceedings.
Judge Judith K. Fitzgerald dismissed the insurer's request in February.
Stephanie Eakins, a financial analyst with Weiss Ratings Inc., based in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., said that the agreement is good for both sides. The money would go into a trust fund to pay claims and absolve the insurers of any future claims.
"Any program that can help give [carriers] certainty about what the ultimate value of claims will be can only be good for the insurance companies," Ms. Eakins observed.
She noted that the agreement is still subject to a number of conditions, including one that Congress does not pass a national asbestos litigation program by Jan. 5, 2005.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.