Singing The SEMCI Song
Could a shortage in underwriting talent boost the quest for single-entry, multiple-carrier interface? That's one hope inspired by an intriguing study from New York-based Conning Research & Consulting, titled “Executing Commercial Underwriting AutomationIt's Only a Tool.”
Conning concludes that while property-casualty carriers are building proprietary underwriting solutions, they will not be viable in the long term, in part, because insurers lack underwriting manpower.
“Commercial insurers are spending lots of money trying to automate a system that for years has been dominated by trained underwriting professionals, and those ranks are thinning,” said Michael Weinstein, director of research at Conning.
“While insurers do not identify a pending underwriter shortage as reason for pursuing automation, we expect that the current workforce of front-line underwriters will have a much smaller number of replacements when they retire or otherwise leave these positions,” Mr. Weinstein noted.
As a result, he said, “product differentiation will no longer live at the front-end of the process. Success will be dependent upon information-gathering and back-end-supported analyses driving sophisticated pricing models.”
The Conning analyst predicts that these dynamics “will force an averaging of data requirements,” which would at last make SEMCI–the Holy Grail for many in the insurance world–a minimum standard for insurers and independent agents. This evolution will ultimately minimize the ability of carriers to employ proprietary data collection differences as an advantage, Conning added.
Mr. Weinstein predicts that underwriters will grow increasingly reliant on automation to speed up the process, because “inevitably, an insurer's failure to respond to agents rapidly and reliably could soon disqualify it from the standard marketplace.”
This is sure to be music to the ears of independent agents, as well as their allies in the battle for standards. However, since we have heard this song before in different keys, we will believe the demise of proprietary carrier systems when we actually see it. But we can't help but hum along and hope Conning's crystal ball is right.
Reproduced from National Underwriter Property & Casualty/Risk & Benefits Management Edition, June 30, 2003. Copyright 2003 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.