Competitive Rating Arguments Aired

By Steven Brostoff

Washington

Competitive rating for auto and homeowners insurance provides more choices and better rates for consumers than prior approval rating, witnesses said at a House Financial Services Subcommittee hearing.

“The price controls of a long obsolete, anticompetitive marketplace are antithetical both to the needs of todays consumers and to American public policy,” former Illinois Insurance Director Nathaniel S. Shapo said.

Mr. Shapo, now an attorney in the Chicago office of Sonnenschein, Nash & Rosenthal, cited Illinois free market rating system, which does not empower the insurance commissioner to review and challenge prices for auto and homeowners insurance, as a model for the nation. The Illinois model, he said, produces abundant supply and empowers consumers to effectively shop for the coverage they need at prices they can afford.

Ernst Csiszar, the insurance director for South Carolina, added that the experience in his state reflects this as well. With a competitive rating law taking effect there in 1999, the number of insurers has increased to 165 (from 78 in 1996). The states residual market decreased from over 600,000 policies in 1999 to about 340, he added.

Moreover, he said, no insurance company has more than 25 percent of the market.

Rep. Richard Baker, R-La., who chairs the Financial Services Committees Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Insurance, said that the regulatory system in a given state affects the availability and affordability of insurance.

“There is a literal maze of regulatory structures out there, and we want to find out which ones actually give consumers the most choices and help make it easier for them to find the best product, with the best service, at the best possible price,” Rep. Baker said.

Rep. Mike Oxley, R-Ohio, who chairs the full Financial Services Committee, agreed. “When wrong-headed regulation drives out competition and leaves consumers unprotected, it is time to examine whether the means is achieving an appropriate end,” he said.

The Financial Services Committee is expected to hold a series of hearings this year on different aspects of insurance regulation, but it is unclear whether it will take a regulatory reform initiative.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, April 14, 2003. Copyright 2003 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved. Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.