FDIC Chair Urges Financial Regs Overhaul

By Steven Brostoff, Washington Editor

NU Online News Service, Oct. 17, 2:12 p.m. EST, Washington?The financial services regulatory system, including insurance regulation, needs restructuring, according to the chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

"We should design a regulatory system that looks like our modern marketplace," Donald E. Powell said yesterday in a speech to the Exchequer Club of Washington.

"We should have three federal regulators," Mr. Powell suggested. "These entities would oversee the banking industry, the securities industry, and those companies that choose an optional federal insurance charter."

Mr. Powell said that the nation should also establish an "authoritative forum" where the three regulators would meet, along with the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve, on a regular basis.

This new body, he said, would sort through areas of overlap or sector-wide policy, and make decisions on systemic risk, permissible activities, and product regulation.

"This structure allows us to provide a federal safety net to America's financial services industry that is streamlined and broad in scope, yet able to amass the technical expertise to deal with problems that arise in this or that sector of the financial marketplace," Mr. Powell said.

This structure, he said, would make the functional regulation idea envisioned by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act more accessible and user-friendly.

"It would ensure clear lines of authority and accountability," Mr. Powell said. "And the process would be efficient enough to ensure the timely delivery of policy and consumer protection decisions on a consistent basis across the entire financial sector."

Too often, he said, when financial regulators engage in turf warfare, the ultimate losers are the industry and the marketplace. "The price is paid in lost opportunities and lost competitiveness," Mr. Powell said.

The industry and the broader markets in the future will require answers from regulators much faster than they are provided today, he added.

"In such a market, delay will be as good as denial," he said. "A nimble and efficient regulatory structure that evaluates emerging issues and problems, and moves quickly to address them, is going to be increasingly important."

Mr. Powell said that anyone can come up with 10 reasons why this structure won't work, and 10 issues he has not considered. But his intent, he said, is not to spell out exactly how the new system would work.

His goal, Mr. Powell said, is to get both industry and his regulatory colleagues thinking about how a new and better structure would work.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.