U.S. Reinsurance Sector Still Struggling

By Lisa S. Howard, International Editor

NU Online News Service, Sept. 5, 12:05 p.m. EST?Dramatically improved rating and coverage conditions for U.S. property-casualty reinsurers has not brought about an overall improvement in industry results, according to the first-half report of the Reinsurance Association of America.

A group of 30 U.S. p-c reinsurers reported a combined ratio of 117.6 for the first half of 2002, compared with 115.6 reported by a similar group of reinsurers for the same period last year, according to the Washington-based RAA. The combined ratio for the first six months of 2002 is comprised of a 90.7 loss ratio and a 26.9 expense ratio, RAA noted.

"The increase in rates, and improvements in terms and conditions are not going to guarantee that the profitability over the medium-term is going to be sustainable," according to Laline Carvalho, an associate director at Standard & Poor's in New York.

"Our outlook on the industry is negative and remains negative, even though companies have been reporting very substantial rate increases and improvements in policy terms and conditions," she said. "We're still dealing with an industry that has significant reserving issues. The direct writers have done a lot of housecleaning and a lot of reserve strengthening, but we feel there is more reserve strengthening to come."

Grace Osborne, a director at S&P, predicted that it would take until the end of 2004 for firm profits to start returning to the industry. "It's a personal view," she said, noting that she perhaps is more pessimistic than other observers.

However, selected individual RAA companies did turn in good combined ratios, demonstrating that some are starting to benefit from the hard market.

Concerning the accompanying table of combined ratio results, listed alphabetically, it should be noted that:

? Results at American Re-Insurance Company, which had a combined ratio of 353.4 for the first six months of 2002, compared with 107.2 for the same period in 2001, reflect a $2 billion strengthening of net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves.

? Converium (Reinsurance) North America, Inc., which came in at 102.0 for this year's first-half, compared with 102.2 last year, was formerly called Zurich Re (North America).

? Gerling Global Reinsurance, which reported a first-half ratio of 153.3, compared with 116.5 last year, is being put into runoff by its Cologne-based parent, Gerling Group.

RAA First-Half Combined Ratios

2002

2001

American Re-Insurance Company

353.4

107.2

Axa Corporate Solutions Re Co.

107.9

110.5

Berkley Insurance Company

95.9

106.4

CNA Re

95.3

300.5

Converium (Re) North America

102.0

102.2

Employers Reinsurance Corp.

117.6

108.6

Everest Reinsurance Co.

97.2

104.9

Folksamerica Reinsurance Co.

98.5

111.0

General Re Group

107.3

119.4

Gerling Global Reinsurance

153.3

116.5

Hartford Re Co.

101.5

113.2

Odyssey America Re Corp.

97.7

101.5

Overseas Partners U.S. Re Co.

107.6

108.0

Partner Re U.S.

106.5

108.4

PMA Capital Ins. Co.

97.5

113.8

PXRE Re Co.

63.4

103.5

QBE Re Corp.

98.6

106.8

SCOR U.S. Group/SCOR Re Co.

110.3

107.9

St. Paul Re

94.7

115.0

Swiss Re America Corp.

114.6

127.1

Transatlantic/Putnam Re Co.

98.0

101.5

Trenwick America Corp.

102.8

130.8

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.