NU Exclusive: CICA Fronting Report
By Caroline McDonald
NU Online News Service, June 6, 4:19 p.m. EST?Many captive insurers still view fronting services as somewhat valuable, but they find that the number of providers and quality of service is down, while costs are up, an industry study has found.
That picture emerged in a joint survey by the Minneapolis-based Captive Insurance Companies Association and the Vermont Captives Insurance Association, titled: "The CICA 2002 Fronting-Risk Sharing Survey." The report follows up on last year's inaugural survey.
This year, 270 captive companies that are members of CICA and or VCIA were polled. The average age of the responding captives is 11.8 years, according to CICA.
"There are three issues," said Brian Donovan, a member of the VCIA board and chairman of CICA's ad-hoc fronting committee. "The cost of fronting has increased an average of 9 percent and captives' perception of the importance of fronting is still very high." The cost-benefit relationship, however, is "becoming unbalanced," he said.
Mr. Donovan, chief executive officer of Steel Tank Insurance Company in Chicago, said that those surveyed previously saw their fronting fees as a "great value." They now say "it's of moderate value or the services are overpriced," he said. "The costs they are paying for the services now are viewed as excessive in light of the benefits they receive from fronting."
Despite all this, he said, "captives are bringing more lines of coverage" into their fronted programs.
"So you have this, 'Gee, it's getting more expensive. We don't think we're getting the value that we used to get, but we still think enough of having a fronted program that we will bring in during these tight times, we're going to have you front more lines of coverage for us.'"
One trend Mr. Donovan said he found "troubling" is an increased concentration of the top five fronting carriers. "Two carriers--ACE and AIG--have about 40 percent of the market," he explained.
Key conclusions drawn by the survey by CICA and VCIA include:
? While fronting/risk-sharing continues to be viewed as very important to the viability of many captives, this service is now more expensive.
? The fronting/risk sharing providers have become more concentrated, reducing the number of viable options available to captive insurers.
? Existing captives are expanding their lines of coverage and bringing new coverages into their fronting/risk-sharing program.
The survey found that while fronting and risk sharing fees continue to represent, on average, less than 10 percent of a captive's premiums, the average fronting/risk sharing fee paid by the captive to the fronting carrier increased 9.3 percent to $740,000 in 2002 from $677,000 in 2001. It is unclear, the survey found, whether the increase was the result of higher written premiums by the captive, fee increases, or a combination of the two.
In 2001, according to CICA, 58 percent of survey respondents found their fronting-risk sharing services to be an "excellent value." In 2002, however, only 37 percent rated their services as excellent.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.