London Insurer Urges Regulation Change
By E.E. Mazier
NU Online News Service, June 17, 11:01 a.m. EST?A prominent London insurance professional suspects that the fear of competition is behind industry opposition to a proposal that would make it easier for non-U.S. reinsurers to do business here.
His comments were brought on by discussions at the Summer National Meeting of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, held in Philadelphia.
The NAIC Reinsurance Task Force debated a proposal to reduce the 100 percent collateralization requirements for the U.S. liabilities of alien reinsurers.
Under the proposal, an NAIC white list would be created of approved reinsurers who would have to fund only 50 percent of their liabilities for unaffiliated risks and 30 percent for affiliates.
The proposal is the brainchild of the International Underwriting Association of London and the Comit? Europ?en des Assurances, based in Paris.
The Task Force agreed to create a new working group to review the proposal, and its members acknowledged that they need to learn more about alien reinsurers.
IUA chairman Stephen Cane, who is also the chief executive officer of Alea London, told National Underwriter he would "love to think" the collateralization issue is purely a security and solvency issue that opponents of liberalization are concerned about, but "I suspect there's an element of competition fear."
Mr. Crane said the Philadelphia hearings were the regulators' first public acknowledgement that trade, including in the area of reinsurance, is headed toward liberalization and globalization.
It also indicated an awareness this is an issue they should take more seriously, he said.
As explained by Mr. Cane, currently a non-U.S. reinsurer must establish a trust fund in the U.S. that is funded at 100 percent of its gross reinsurance liabilities, "plus an extra buffer" of $20 million.
Alternatively, the alien reinsurer must collateralize the liability by a letter of credit for each individual cedant, Mr. Cane continued. By and large, there are no similar barriers for U.S. companies in the United Kingdom or in European Union countries, he said.
He said that the problem with setting up 100 percent trust funds is that "a significant amount of money" that cannot be touched is tied up and removed from a reinsurer's "everyday operations."
At the same time, "reinsurance relies on spread, with the premiums collected from one company used to pay claims to another company, Mr. Cane said.
He noted that the IUA and CEA have long argued that competition is not an issue. This is because U.S. ceding companies tend to purposely devise reinsurance programs that place part of the reinsurance in domestic markets and the rest in foreign markets.
Because the risk is "fairly evenly spread" between the U.S. and the global markets, Mr. Cane does not think that alien reinsurers will stampede to the United States just because of a concession in the collateralization requirements.
"Frankly, if everyone operated on the U.S. system it would gum up the works eventually in that no one would get reinsurance," Mr. Cane said.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.