Calif. WC Rating Bill 'Regulatory Overkill'
NU Online News Service, May 10, 10:45 a.m. EST?A bill working its way through the California Assembly that would give the insurance commissioner greater authority over workers' compensation rates is contrary to the state's open competition rating law and will only serve to hurt competition in the state, according to the Alliance of American Insurers.
AB 1985, sponsored by Tom Calderon, D-Montebello, would, in essence, "switch the current open competition method of setting workers' compensation rates in California to prior approval," said Peter Gorman, vice president of the Alliance's Western Region in San Francisco. "The proposal is regulatory overkill where a few minor adjustments and clarification of existing law would suffice."
Mr. Gorman noted that the legislation is rooted in concerns about rate adequacy in the state's workers' comp market, which has seen the demise of several insurers over the past few years. The problem, he said, is not inadequate rates being charged, but rapidly rising and unexpected medical and indemnity costs.
"Since the open competition law went into effect in 1995, carriers' inability to accurately forecast dramatically increasing and unprecedented loss costs have contributed to the current market distress," Mr. Gorman explained. "This situation is beginning to correct itself with major rate increases being filed with the department without regulatory intervention."
Mr. Gorman said that the commissioner already has more than enough authority under existing law to intervene prior to insolvency to force carriers to charge adequate rates.
Currently, he said, sections of the state insurance code give the commissioner authority to order rate increases when they are found to be inadequate and to require actuarial justification of rates when they appear to be inadequate. California law also empowers the insurance commissioner to order a company to cease and desist conduct that would render the insurer insolvent.
"What the current code does not do is provide the commissioner with prior approval authority over all rates, including final rates charged by insurers," Mr. Gorman said. The commissioner, he added, is only required to approve advisory loss costs. Carriers must add their administrative costs to these and file them with the Insurance Department, he said.
A particularly burdensome part of AB 1985, he contends, would permit the commissioner to disapprove an insurer's rate or supplementary rate information if the rates are not justified by credible and verifiable supporting information. This, he said, "eliminates all judgment-based scheduled rating plans." Most company rating plans must rely on judgment and "this requirement could preclude most company rating plans."
If approved, AB 1985 would "roll back the clock to a time that no longer is appropriate to today's competitive marketplace," Mr. Gorman said. "Employers now demand that carriers respond quickly and on an individual account basis." AB 1985, on the other hand, replaces pricing flexibility "with a straightjacket that would make workers' compensation premiums less responsive to changes in costs."
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
