Insurer Legislative Outlook Gloomy

New York

Most top insurance industry officials doubt that Congress will establish a federal terrorism reinsurance mechanism this year, and a third dont even believe such a program would boost terrorism capacity to any great extent, a survey here revealed.

Seventy percent of those responding to a survey at last week's Property/Casualty Insurance Joint Industry Forum said that under current circumstances, Congress would not pass legislation this year establishing federal participation in terrorism coverage.

On an even more pessimistic note, 35 percent said that even if such a bill should pass, it would not “significantly increase the availability of terrorism coverage.”

“Without a federal backstop, availability of insurance will continue to suffer,” according to Robert Hartwig, chief economist and senior vice president of the New York-based Insurance Information Institute, one of nine p-c organizations co-sponsoring the forum. “It will also take longer for the industry to build the capital and confidence to underwrite this new risk, which will have an impact on the broader economy for at least the next year.”

An overwhelming number of respondents–ninety percent–are also convinced there is no chance that Congress will pass and President George W. Bush will sign legislation this year that “will help contain the current asbestos crisis.”

Respondents were similarly pessimistic about the chances for tort reform, with 72 percent saying that they do not expect any progress in this area this year.

However, a little more than half–54 percent–said they expect some progress in the fight against insurance fraud this year.

Meanwhile, 75 percent said they expect the pace of convergence in financial services to slow down in 2002.

The survey also showed that insurance industry leaders are very bullish about the prospects for higher rates and improved profitability in the year ahead, although analysts here warned that a rapid influx of capital could quickly short-circuit the hardening market–that is, unless a catastrophe hits, especially another terrorist attack. (See story, bottom of page 5.)


Reproduced from National Underwriter Property & Casualty/Risk & Benefits Management Edition, January 21, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


Contact Webmaster

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.