9/11 Business Interruption Claims Analysis
NU Online News Service, Feb. 20, 3:38 p.m. EST?Business interruption insurance claims arising from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks involve a variety of unique, gray areas that will keep some claims dragging on for years before being settled, according to an international consulting firm's study.
Business interruption claims will account for more than a quarter of the insurance claims to arise from the Sept. 11 events, according to the report released today by PricewaterhouseCoopers in New York. The company said such claims stretch across the financial services, communications, media and travel industries.
PWC noted that business interruption coverage generally requires "direct physical loss or damage to the property," and is written to cover loss of gross earnings, which "result from interruption of or interference with the business, and caused by loss to real or personal property."
However, the firm's study found that claims surrounding Sept. 11 have raised questions not contemplated by underwriters and adjusters prior to the attack, which have yet to be answered.
Among the unresolved issues, it noted, is how to evaluate liability for business interruption claims for businesses that were not in the proximity of the events of Sept. 11.
Also undetermined, PWC said, is how to measure the period of interruption and how to differentiate such losses from the changes in the post-Sept. 11 economy and whether it is necessary to do so.
Business losses that easily exceed policy limits will be paid quickly in the next six months to one year, while complex claims, which are litigated, might drag on for four-to-six years, PWC's report said.
According to the report, future business interruption policies might restrict terrorism exposures through narrowing limits of liability, increased deductibles, selective underwriting, and other means.
Business interruption rates, PWC found, are increasing between 30 percent and 200 percent depending upon the loss experience of the insured. Deductibles in some cases, PWC said, have increased 10 times that of last year's levels.
The study found that since Sept. 11, some insurance industry advocates are stressing that future policies should more clearly define terms such as "terrorism," "uninsurable," and "uninsured political risk," as well as distinguishing insured perils from uninsured elements.
PWC said these industry members were also suggesting that policies limit business interruption coverage to the direct consequence of physical damage from an insured peril, and not include as many possible consequences as are contemplated today.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.