The court found that the COVID-19 government shutdown order does not constitute a 'direct physical loss.'

A woman seriously injured after a fall on black ice settled her suit against the property owner and snow removal contractor for $2.15 million.

The state's supreme court ruled the association can assert direct claims against the insurer, but must arbitrate the case.

The case involved allegations of understated payroll and misclassification of workers under New Jersey law.

The Colorado Court of Appeals rejects exclusions denying UM/UIM coverage for injuries sustained in vehicles regularly used by an insured but not on a policy.

Despite their ruling, the Colorado Court of Appeals added that "this case may present an opportunity for our supreme court to provide clarity on this question."

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held that COVID did not cause "direct physical loss or damage to" property under business interruption policies.