Swift Currie's Rusty Watts, on behalf of the appellants, argued the company shouldn't have to pay out workers' comp benefits because Gierum started making "tens of thousands of dollars" after his injury and wasn't doing handyman work in the 13 weeks prior. Credit: Ivan Kruk/Shutterstock
Georgia's courts continue to grapple with the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly when it comes to decisions regarding unemployment and workers' compensation.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
