In its letter, the IRS said: "...payments to [a] captive are not insurance premiums (because the arrangement does not involve insurance risk, there is no risk distribution, there is no risk shifting, and/or the arrangement is not insurance in its commonly accepted sense) and a revenue agent may deny taxpayer's claimed deduction." (Photo: ALM Archives) In its letter, the IRS said: "…payments to [a] captive are not insurance premiums (because the arrangement does not involve insurance risk, there is no risk distribution, there is no risk shifting, and/or the arrangement is not insurance in its commonly accepted sense) and a revenue agent may deny taxpayer's claimed deduction." (Photo: ALM Archives)

In a recent ruling, the Internal Revenue Service said that owners of abusive micro captives owe the adjustment payments linked to their failures to withhold taxes on the cash used to make the micro-captive premium payments.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Allison Bell

Allison Bell, ThinkAdvisor's insurance editor, previously was LifeHealthPro's health insurance editor. She has a bachelor's degree in economics from Washington University in St. Louis and a master's degree in journalism from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. She can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter at @Think_Allison.

Captives
Regulation/Legislation