NU Online News Service, Jan. 6, 2:44 p.m. EST
Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. does not think the state Supreme Court addressed all of the issues it should have before reinstating what now is a judgment of more than $100 million for policyholders.
The state-run insurer of last resort ended 2011 with the bad news—a ruling from the state's highest court that reinstated the award overturned by an appeals court. Each policyholder in the class could get $5,000 each plus interest.
The insurer is asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision.
Citizens has been accused of failing to start the claims-adjusting process with the timeframe set by law following hurricane Katrina and Rita in 2005.
Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon called the ruling a “potentially devastating event.”
The insurer “feels the Supreme Court did not answer all the questions presented to it [but] rather just issued an opinion confirming the ruling by the trail court judge that his allowance of $5,000 per claimant was permitted,” says Richard Robertson, chief executive officer of Citizens, in an email.
“[The court] did not address several items, including a constitutional issue raised by us and the state attorney general concerning the ability to impose a penalty without any showing of bad faith or conduct on the part of the insurer,” he adds.
Citizens plans to file supporting documents on Jan. 10 and hopes to have “a favorable ruling from the court as soon as they review our request.”
Citizens avoided having to post a bond to pay the original judgment while it appealed the case. Now, unless the state Supreme Court reconsiders, all property-insurance policyholders inLouisianacould be footing the bill because Citizens has the ability to levy assessments.
Donelon says the worst-case scenario is that Citizens' maximum exposure to the decision is $200 million, if other eligible policyholders emerge.
Donelon says he is not opposed to policyholders getting $5,000 if they deserve it, but each should have to go to court to get the amount determined instead of an overall blanket judgment for all. He says private insurers faced similar class-action lawsuits but they were not deemed applicable for class-action status.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.