“My aspiration is to develop a foundation of interaction between the FIO and state regulators, to establish customs and practices that best serve the United States, our economy, the insurance industry and consumers,” McRaith says.

He made his comments in testimony before the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity of the House Financial Services Committee.

It was his first public comments since he took over the post in May after several years as Illinois insurance director. The FIO was created under the Dodd-Frank financial services reform law. It is housed in the Treasury Department and reports directly to the Treasury secretary.

Its job is to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry, including identifying issues or gaps in the regulation of insurers that could contribute to a systemic crisis in the insurance industry or the United States financial system.

McRaith says the Treasury had announced in May that it would establish a Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance to provide the FIO with advice on issues related to the responsibilities of the office.

He says the advisory panel will be comprised of 15 members, and approximately half would be state-insurance regulators.

He says there have been more than 100 applications for committee membership, and that he hopes to name the members “in the near future.”

On the international front, McRaith says the FIO will work with state regulators and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors “to develop a process that guards against undue reporting burdens, builds in proper data-confidentiality mechanisms, and preserves the competitiveness of the U.S.-based insurers.”

Citing the fact that there are a number of international issues on the table, McRaith says the FIO will coordinate with the state-insurance regulators to develop and represent U.S. views on the different elements requested public comments on the IAIS proposal for a common framework, or ComFrame, for overseeing large, multinational insurers.

Among its proposals, ComFrame is asking, in comments requested in July, whether supervision should be based on a rules-based or principles-based approach and when to evaluate the financial burden on supervisors, industry, and consumers.

In his comments, McRaith notes that the 2007-2009 financial crisis, including the need for the U.S. government to provides billions in aid to American International Group to ensure its solvency, justified creation of the FIO.

He says it highlighted the lack of insurance-sector expertise within the federal government.

“A federal insurance presence provides our international counterparts with a central point of contact for insurance-related matters, and facilitates the coordination of federal insurance efforts,” he says.