NU Online News Service, Oct. 07, 9:12 a.m. EST
Insurance trade associations are attempting to get through to Michigan lawmakers in order to prevent a "death spiral" of the state's no-fault automobile system.
"Michigan can bring its system some reasonable reforms that will offer the consumer greater flexibility and choice in their coverage while still offering them the protection they need," writes Erin Collins, Mid-Atlantic state affairs manager for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Cos., to the state House Insurance Committee in support of HB 4936.
The measure, introduced by Rep. Pete Lund, R-Shelby Township, looks to give drivers four options for medical coverage—$5 million, $1 million, $500,000 and $250,000.
Michigan's law currently provides unlimited medical care under personal injury protection (PIP) coverage.
HB 4936 also establishes a fee schedule in hopes of bridling costs. A fee schedule exists for the state's workers' compensation system.
The insurance industry in Michigan says it is looking to stabilize the state's no-fault automobile system before costs get out of control.
The average cost per claim has increased nearly 170 percent over the last decade to $36,245 from $13,617 in 2000, says the Insurance Institute of Michigan.
"The current system with its uncontrolled medical costs and mandated benefit that doesn't allow consumer choice will simply put Michigan behind for business growth and continue to drive costs up for both consumers and insurers," Collins continues.
David Snyder, vice president and associate general counsel of the American Insurance Association, urges the House committee to consider reforms to "reverse the current slide into a 'death spiral' of rising costs, rising premiums, rising affordability problems and rising anger from the public." He says HB 4936 constrains costs while keeping the benefits of the no-fault system.
Snyder says several states have repealed no-fault laws, Florida is considering it and New Jersey struggled for decades to reform its system. Michigan will face similar calls to repeal the entire system if it does nothing to fix it now, he adds.
"My experience is that every case of repeal or near appeal in which I have been involved, was preceded by extensive efforts to achieve moderate reforms that failed," he says. "Without those reforms, costs continued to rise as did public anger and repeal because the preferred option."
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.