NU Online News Service, Aug. 18, 2:01 p.m. EDT

The Institute of International Finance says regulators need to coordinate development of reforms affecting the banking and insurance industries to avoid unintended consequences.

In a report released yesterday titled, “The Implications of Financial Regulatory Reform for the Insurance Industry,” the association says failing to understand the differences between the banking and insurance industry and not coordinating development of regulations could have “profound implications” for both industries.

Failure to coordinate could lead regulators to “make unwarranted assumptions about how regulatory reform will operate in practice.”

“Uncoordinated reforms will be less effective in promoting financial stability and will undermine the ability of insurers and banks to undertake their core functions in supporting economic activity and recovery,” says Walter Kielholz, IFF working group chairman and chairman of Swiss Re Ltd.

“At a time of important regulatory change, policy makers need to understand how the insurance and banking sectors will interact under the new regulatory regimes,” he adds.

The report, produced in collaboration with Oliver Wyman, notes that as Europe develops Solvency II for implementation in 2013, the Basal Committee on Banking Supervision and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority have released results illustrating the impact of new regulations. However, both reports were developed independently of one another and do not examine what impact the new measures will have on one another's sector.

Among some issues the report points to:

• There are incentives in Europe for insurers to shorten the maturity of insurer's corporate bond holdings. But such a move “may run counter to the precepts of good risk management and asset—liability management principals by encouraging insurers to shorten the tenor of their asset portfolios while their cash-flow profiles remain generally long-term.”

• Incentives to take on more sovereign debt holdings, while given the current instability in several government bond markets, such a move “may be questionable.”

• Banks will need to raise $750 billion of capital to meet Solvency II requirements, and assumptions are made that the insurance sector would be a ready market for providing new capital and funding, says IIF Managing Director Charles Dallara. He adds that such an assumption “may be overstated.”

“The willingness and ability of the insurance sector to provide a ready market for new capital and funding may be quite limited,” says Axel Lehman, a member of the IFF working group and group chief risk officer and member of the executive committee of Zurich Financial Services.

“Even if insurers were willing to increase their exposure to bank assets in the form of debt, new insurance regulation and sound risk management will tend to mitigate against any further increase, particularly of long term funding,” he says. “Bank debt already makes up a significant portion of insurers' portfolios.”

Lehman went on to say the industry “fully supports stronger regulatory standards,” but that regulation needs to strengthen the financial system.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.