NU Online News Service, March 15, 3:20 p.m. EST
The Japan earthquake and tsunami revealed a potential flaw in catastrophe modelers' planning, as modelers pointed to the fact that they did not account for the complete devastation that hit the island nation.
In its report earlier this week that estimated between $15 billion and $35 billion in property losses from the quake, Boston-based AIR Worldwide said it does not include such events as took place in Japan last week in its models.
"…the AIR Earthquake Model for Japan does not account for the effects of tsunami," AIR said. "As more detailed information becomes available, AIR plans to independently estimate the loss due to tsunami and provide a combined loss estimate that avoids double-counting in the affected areas."
Robert Muir-Wood, chief research officer for risk modeler Risk Management Solutions, told NU Online News Service that for some models tsunamis are a "deterministic footprint," but are not generally a part of catastrophe modeling.
The earthquake and tsunami in Japan will "very likely" make tsunamis a fundamental part of catastrophe modeling in the future, he said.
There are two reasons why tsunamis, especially in Japan, were not a part of catastrophe models, Mr. Muir-Wood said. First, the government has spent a lot of money on sea walls that were thought to protect the populace from such an event. But the recent event "came clear over the top."
Second, the area of concern was with Tokyo bay, where it was thought a tsunami would not be a significant problem.
"People believed that this was not such a big risk," he said.
For modeling purposes, tsunamis would only be a concern if they were an extreme loss event, noted Mr. Muir-Wood, and this particular event was not only extreme, but very rare. The last such tsunami of this magnitude in Japan was recorded 1,100 years ago.
As for nuclear catastrophe modeling, it is not an insurable event for core insurers, he noted. However, there are lessons to be learned from the reactor failures in Japan from a risk modeling perspective, said Mr. Muir-Wood, and it is an area that RMS might get into in the future, but not one that would be the focus of an insurable risk.
For insurance, executives insuring nuclear risks said that earthquake and tsunami risks are excluded from coverage.
As for the status of the nuclear plants in Japan, the International Atomic Energy Agency said today that there were explosions in three nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan. Three other reactors at the site were shut down for maintenance before the tsunami.
Elevated levels of radioactivity were detected in the area and an evacuation of a 20 kilometer zone (12.5 miles) was put into effect. People within a 30 kilometer (19 mile) radius of the plant were advised to take shelter indoors.
A 30 kilometer (19 mile) no fly zone was also established around the plant, the IAEA said.
The IAEA said a 6.1 magnitude earthquake was reported around 13:31 UTC (8:30 a.m. EDT) in Eastern Honshu, Japan. The Hamaoka nuclear power plant is located about 100 kilometers (62 miles) from the epicenter of that earthquake. The plant operates safely, the IAEA said.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.