I'm a litigation reporter for Connecticut Law Tribune, covering litigation wins, verdict news, settlements, interesting cases, etc. Contact me with tips at [email protected].
"There simply was no period of time from the plaintiff's hire in 1983 until his retirement in 2016 at which the plaintiff was not a regular member of the Bridgeport Police Department," the court said.
"The trial court found that the plaintiffs satisfied their burden of establishing ... that the false imprisonment arose out of the defendant's business pursuits, and that the business pursuits exclusion bars coverage," the opinion said.
The Connecticut Supreme Court has decided that three business who undertook "repairs" to prevent the spread of COVID-19 weren't actually "repairs" that would give rise to a covered claim.
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
FC&S Coverage Insider helps you stay on top of what's happening in the industry, bringing you the latest risk and coverage analyses, discussions, and more.