The justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that a change in vehicles covered by an auto policy does not equate a "purchase" entitling the policyholders to another opportunity to waive UM/UIM stacking.
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
FC&S Coverage Insider helps you stay on top of what's happening in the industry, bringing you the latest risk and coverage analyses, discussions, and more.