Because Ryan was unlawfully deprived of the $346,612 paid to Weaver, the Fifth District Court of Appeals found there was coverage under the Employee Theft provision of the policy.
A judge from the Eastern District of Louisiana has dismissed a case where the plaintiff's attorney didn't actually have an agreement with the plaintiff when the suit was filed.
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
FC&S Coverage Insider helps you stay on top of what's happening in the industry, bringing you the latest risk and coverage analyses, discussions, and more.