A Maryland appellate court ruled that an insurer is obligated to defend an additional insured for claims arising, in whole or in part, for the actions of the named insured. The case is James G. Davis Constr. Corp. v. Erie Ins. Exch., 126 A.3d 753 (Md. App. 2015). 

James G. Davis Construction (Davis) worked as the general contractor on a residential construction project in the District of Columbia. Davis hired Tricon Construction (Tricon) as a subcontractor to work on the HVAC in the house. The subcontract between Davis and Tricon, required Tricon to purchase an insurance policy that would also insure Davis for claims arising from Tricon's negligence. 

The Certificate and the Policy

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis