The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of an insurer based on the inapplicability of an additional insured endorsement. The case is Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Am. Safety Cas. Ins. Co., 365 S.W.3d 165 (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).
Williams Underground was a subcontractor for Traffic Systems Construction, Inc. on a road construction project. A Williams employee was injured by a third-party vehicle while working. He sued Williams, Traffic, and the vehicle driver for negligence. Traffic was insured by Continental Casualty Company, and Williams had a policy through American Safety Casualty Company.
Traffic requested coverage under the additional insured endorsement attached to the American Safety policy, but American Safety refused on the grounds that the underlying suit was either not covered or excluded by the American Safety policy. Continental defended Traffic in the underlying suit and ultimately settled with the injured employee for $250,000.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]