Essentially a pipe burst on the third floor causing damage to our client's space on the first floor. The landlord has agreed to provide building insurance to our insured, but the insurer believes that our policy should be insuring the paint, wallpaper and other improvements that are permanently attached.
I included the lease because it is relevant in this scenario, it states building insurance should be provided by the landlord, also states the landlord is responsible to repair floor, walls, etc., but also states tenant should repair their alterations, additions and improvements and/or fixtures introduced to the leased premises.
My question is: If they have been paying the landlord to provide building insurance could they not theoretically collect from the policy the landlord is proving them with in order to repair their alterations, additions and improvements and/or fixtures introduced to the leased premises? Specifically, wallpaper and paint that is permanently installed and will become part of the building when the premises is vacated by them after their lease?
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]