I am handling a homeowners claim for the roof damages caused by the contractor who abandoned the repair. Homeowner hired a contractor who started the roof tear-off but never came back to complete the repairs. The homeowner filed a claim for vandalism but the carrier denied the coverage.
It appears to me that the policy language: "However, we will pay for any resulting loss from items 3.a., 3.b., and 3.c. unless the resulting loss is itself a Loss Not Insured as described in this Section" indicates that the loss caused by the contractor who abandoned the project is covered as it is not excluded in Section I – Losses not insured. However I wanted to hear your opinion on the coverage. Thank You!
Illinois Subscriber
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]