We had a computer tech installing an HDMI cable to the back of a 3 panel TV Wall. Three separate TVs aligned together for a single image. While looking for the wires his shoulder pressed against the 3rd screen and cracked the screen. He found the wire afterwards and replaced it. The wire connected into the 1st screen.

Any case law to justify the third screen would be the item he was working on and not the first screen? We even believe he wasn't working on any screen but the wiring which connects to screen 1 and not screen three.

The property in your care custody and control exclusion was used to deny the claim which seems an over reach.