We believe the insurance company has misinterpreted the policy regarding collapse, can you look at the documents and let us know what you think?
Solar panels are installed on the carport and power room directly below. The insured specifically increased the typically 10% coverage for other structures to be sure that he was covered. The solar panels installed on the carport are essential and are the only power source for the dwelling and payments were made on the power room. The carport appears to be servicing two functions, covered parking and mounting for solar panels directly above the power room. Denial letter is quoting only a portion of the additional coverages which I feel is misleading. Then referencing section 1 losses insured then section 1 losses not insured?
Texas Subscriber
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]