July 1, 2019
The insured hit and totaled another vehicle. The 3rd party PD plaintiff had a 0% loan for the following 4 years. The manufacturer no longer is offering 0 interest, and the plaintiff is demanding the amount of interest she will now have to pay over the next 4 years. No change in credit standing of the plaintiff. Is the interest owed under the personal auto policy as legitimate damages?
Washington Subscriber
The purpose of auto insurance is to pay for the vehicle that was damaged in the accident and restore the injured party to her position before the loss. In this case, the payment is meant to pay for the totaled car. The status of her loan arrangement is immaterial; the policy pays for the actual cash value of the vehicle, not any loan arrangement. The insurer is not concerned with whether the recipient uses the insurance proceeds to buy a more expensive car, or a less expensive car. and pocket the remainder of the settlement. She could be overfinanced and owe more than the vehicle is worth; she would not be compensated for that loan amount, just the value of the vehicle.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]