Discharge From Sewer, Drain Or Sump (Not Flood-Related)

 September 17, 2018

This is a Commercial Property risk. I have a toilet that continued to run as the toilet stopper did not seal properly. All would be fine except the heavy rains saturated the drain field not allowing the water to drain from the toilet. This resulted in an overflow causing damage. Insured has a $10k limit on discharge from sewer, drain, or sump from a CP 73 51 endorsement.

 Does a limit apply or would it be considered a loss under the normal limits. But for the saturated drain field, there would be no loss. The drain field caused the water to not be able to drain properly — is that a back-up by definition?

North Carolina Subscriber

Endorsement CP 73 51 is a proprietary endorsement that includes additional coverage for Discharge From Sewer, Drain Or Sump (Not Flood-Related), up to a $10,000 limit in the endorsement. This response is in regards to the water damage claim submitted for our review. Here are the facts as presented:

 (1) There was a toilet that ran due to a stopper that did not seal properly. The toilet overflowed.

(2) The drain field overflowed due to heavy rains.

(3) The drain field is tied to the septic system serving the insured property.

 Based on these facts, there are two causes of loss, and the extent of damage from each cause of loss cannot be determined by us:

 (1) What caused the toilet stopper to not seal properly – was it wear and tear or faulty workmanship? What interior water damage resulted from the toilet overflow?

(2) What caused the drain field to overflow – despite heavy rains reasonably it should still have absorbed the water so what factors may have contributed to the drain field overflow? Was sludge or other obstruction a contributing factor? What interior water damage resulted from the drain overflow?

 This is not an expert opinion – just my own experiences with a broken toilet flapper. Regardless of how much the toilet ran, it never ran outside the toilet bowl because the water was carried out by the drain. If the drain was stopped up, not allowing the water to flow through the drain, then the water could back up and out from the toilet bowl, causing interior water damage.

 If the water damage was caused by the broken toilet seal, there would be no coverage.

 If the water damage was caused by the drain field overflow, then there would be limited coverage of $10,000 for Discharge From Sewer, Drain Or Sump (Not Flood-Related) provided in the proprietary endorsement CP 73 51.

 However, this is an issue of fact, not coverage. We can only speak to the coverages that would be provided in the form based on the two causes of loss as presented.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis