We have a question concerning the insurer's duty to defend. Some of our staff members say that if an insurer tenders the policy limits for a claim, the duty to defend ends because the limit of liability on the policy has been exhausted. Others say that is not necessarily so and that an insurer can not just pay the policy limits and walk away, leaving the insured to fend for himself as to the defense against a claim. Do you have an opinion on this subject?

Massachusetts Subscriber

Perhaps the best way to discuss this question is to read the wording of the duty to defend clause as it appears in some coverage forms.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis