A fire in an 18 unit apartment building (no negligence on the part of the landlord), shut the entire building down. The city put up the tenants for a period of time until they were able to find permanent housing and subsequently billed the landlord for the temporary housing expense and put a lien on the property in the amount of $20,801.16.
The policy pays for tenant moving of contents with a $10,000.00 limit, which was exceeded, but the insurance company denied coverage for the housing cost under the building section of the policy, as well as under extra expense.
It is my argument that the cost of the tenants temporary housing should be covered under the business income portion of the claim, as an expense directly related to the fire that reduces the insured's profit for the year. The insurance company has rejected that claim and will not pay the expense. Is there coverage for this expense?
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]