|

April 25, 2016

 The insured brought an action against the insurer to recover expenses for transporting crops and drying them at other facilities after a fire destroyed a grain handler dryer, fans, and parts covered by an agricultural endorsement to a farm and ranch policy. This case is Huether v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company, 871 N.W.2d 444 (2015).

 Huether contracted with Nodak Mutual to provide insurance coverage for his house, buildings and structures on his farm. Huether added an equipment endorsement insuring his agricultural equipment to the policy. This endorsement provided coverage for direct physical loss or damage to the equipment, including a grain handler dryer, fans, and parts. Subsequently, a fire broke out and destroyed these items.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis