The homeowners insurer for a gun owner brought an action against the shooting victim for a declaratory judgment that an intentional shooting was physical abuse and thus, excluded from coverage. This case is Miglino v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance, 174 So.3d 479 (2015).
The insured is Stein He lent a gun to his sister and then the sister shot Miglino. Miglino sued the sister and the insured, alleging that the sister intentionally shot him and asserting a negligent entrustment claim against Stein. The insurer initially defended Stein but the filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify the insured because of an exclusion in the policy.
The trial court granted summary judgment to the insurer and this appeal followed.
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, noted that the homeowners policy excluded coverage for damages arising out of sexual molestation, corporal punishment or physical or mental abuse. Miglino claimed that the exclusion did not apply because the shooting does not fit within the definition of physical abuse. He specifically likens the definition of physical abuse to torture or actions meant to humiliate or demean. The appeals court did not agree.
The court said that Black's Law Dictionary defines physical as relating or pertaining to the body, and defines abuse as physical or mental maltreatment, often resulting in mental or physical injury. Thus, said the court, the plain meaning of physical abuse encompasses the intentional shooting of Miglino by the sister. Such an act clearly constitutes physical maltreatment and physical injury as described in the dictionary.
Miglino argued that the exclusion does not apply because there was no torture, torment, humiliation, or degradation present in the act of shooting him. The court found no definitions that include the words torture, torment, humiliate, or any other similar words that Miglino insists are part of physical abuse. Common sense and common meaning dictate otherwise.
The ruling of the trial court was affirmed.
Editor's Note: The best summary for this case comes from the court: "common sense and common meaning" dictate that shooting someone is physical abuse. The claimant offered an interesting idea that physical abuse actually means torture or torment, but even though the policy did not defined physical abuse, common sense and common meaning ruled against the claimant in this instance.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]