Personal Auto Accident Question

December 21, 2015

Under a personal auto policy we have a situation in which our insured struck the rear of another vehicle, panicked, and immediately put the car in reverse and backed into the vehicle behind them. I am of the opinion that there is no intervening cause, and it would be one loss. Would you interpret this as one or two occurrences?

Iowa Subscriber

The standard PAP pays for damages resulting from an auto accident, so the number of occurrences is not the point under the standard PAP. Since the policy does not define an accident, you might want to consider the police report for an answer. If the police designate this as one accident or two accidents, that should clarify the situation.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis