Ride-Sharing Insurance Regulations
July 17, 2015
As ride-sharing has caught on in popularity, it has come to the attention of legislators that drivers for companies such as Uber and Lyft have gaps in insurance coverage and often are unaware of it. This leaves the drivers and others exposed to significant financial issues in event of an accident. Most ride-sharing companies provide insurance while the driver has a passenger in the vehicle, but when the driver first turns on the application to look for a passenger, there is a gap in coverage. While some states have passed legislation requiring coverage during this gap period, many are still considering it. The following chart shows what states are requiring for ride-sharing companies.
State | Yes | Pending | Shot Down Legislation | Nothing Yet |
Alabama |
|
|
| X |
Alaska |
|
|
| X |
Arizona | X – $250k liability insurance, background checks, vehicle inspection, zero tolerance drug/alcohol |
|
|
|
Arkansas |
|
|
| X |
California | X |
|
|
|
Colorado | X |
|
|
|
Connecticut |
|
|
| X |
Delaware |
|
|
| X |
Florida |
| X – $125k death/injury, $50k property, $250 uninsured/under With passenger all categories above $1 million |
|
|
Georgia | X – $1 million death/injury, property, uninsured/under |
|
|
|
Hawaii |
|
| X |
|
Idaho | X- $1 million death/injury, property, uninsured/under |
|
|
|
Illinois |
| X |
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
| X |
Iowa |
| X |
|
|
Kansas |
| X |
|
|
Kentucky |
| X |
|
|
Louisiana |
|
|
| X |
State | Yes | Pending | Shot Down Legislation | Nothing Yet |
Maine |
|
|
| X |
Maryland |
| X |
|
|
Massachusetts |
| X |
|
|
Michigan |
| X |
|
|
Minnesota |
| X |
|
|
Mississippi |
|
|
| X |
Missouri |
|
|
| X |
Montana |
|
|
| X |
Nebraska |
|
|
| X |
Nevada |
| X-Regulated by PUC; must apply for permit and renew annually; liability coverage $1.5 million while transporting passengers; background checks before hire and every 3 years |
|
|
New Hampshire |
|
|
| X |
New Jersey |
|
|
| X |
New Mexico |
|
|
| X |
New York |
| X |
|
|
North Carolina |
| X |
|
|
North Dakota |
|
|
| X |
Ohio |
| X |
|
|
Oklahoma | X- Tulsa and OK City |
|
|
|
Oregon | X- Portland |
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
| X |
|
|
Rhode Island |
|
|
| X |
South Carolina | X |
|
|
|
South Dakota |
|
|
| X |
Tennessee |
|
|
| X |
Texas |
| X |
|
|
Utah |
|
|
| X |
Vermont |
|
|
| X |
Virginia | X |
|
|
|
Washington | X- Seattle |
|
|
|
West Virginia |
|
|
| X |
Wisconsin |
| X |
|
|
Wyoming |
|
|
| X |
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]