Arizona Definition of Insurance Fraud

A.R.S. § 20-466.01

 

June 15, 2015

 

A person who violates § 20-463 or 20-463.01 with the intent to injure, defraud or deceive an insurer is guilty of a class 6 felony.

 

|

A.R.S. § 20-463

 

A. It is a fraudulent practice and unlawful for a person to knowingly:

 

1. Present, cause to be presented or prepare with the knowledge or belief that it will be presented an oral or written statement, including computer generated documents, to or by an insurer, reinsurer, purported insurer or reinsurer, insurance producer or agent of a reinsurer that contains untrue statements of material fact or that fails to state any material fact with respect to any of the following:

 

(a) An application for the issuance or renewal of an insurance policy.

(b) The rating of an insurance policy.

(c) A claim for payment or benefit pursuant to an insurance policy.

(d) Premiums paid on any insurance policy.

(e) Payments made pursuant to the terms of any insurance policy.

(f) An application for a certificate of authority.

(g) The financial condition of an insurer, reinsurer or purported insurer or reinsurer.

(h) The acquisition of an insurer or reinsurer or the concealing of any information concerning any fact material to the acquisition.

 

2. Solicit or accept new or renewal insurance risks by or for any insolvent insurer, reinsurer or other entity licensed to transact insurance business in this state.

 

3. Conceal or attempt to conceal from the department or remove or attempt to remove from the home office, place of safekeeping or other place of business of any insurer, reinsurer or other entity licensed to transact insurance business in this state part or all of the assets or records of the assets, transactions and affairs.

 

4. Divert or attempt or conspire to divert the monies of an insurer, reinsurer, entity licensed to transact insurance business in this state or other person in connection with:

 

(a) The transaction of insurance or reinsurance.

(b) The conduct of business activities by any insurer, reinsurer or other entity licensed to transact insurance business in this state.

(c) The formation, acquisition or dissolution of any insurer, reinsurer or other entity licensed to transact insurance business in this state.

 

5. Assist, abet, solicit or conspire with another person to violate paragraph 1 of this subsection.

 

6. Employ, use or act as a runner, capper or steerer for the purposes of violating paragraph 1 of this subsection.

 

B. A person who acts without malice, fraudulent intent or bad faith is not subject to liability for filing reports or furnishing orally or in writing other information concerning suspected, anticipated or completed fraudulent insurance acts if the reports or information is provided to or received from:

 

1. The director or the department.

 

2. Law enforcement officials and their agents and employees.

 

3. The national association of insurance commissioners, other state insurance departments, a federal or state agency or bureau established to detect and prevent fraudulent insurance acts, and the agency's or bureau's agents, employees or designees, or an organization established by insurers to assist in the detection and prevention of fraudulent insurance acts, and the organization's agents, employees or designees.

 

C. A person, or an officer, employee or agent of the person acting within the scope of employment or agency of that officer, employee or agent, identified under subsection B, paragraph 1, 2 or 3 when performing authorized activities without malice, fraudulent intent or bad faith is not subject to civil liability for libel, slander or another relevant tort. No civil cause of action may be brought against the person or entity.

 

D. A person or entity under subsection B or C is entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs if the person or entity is a prevailing party in a civil cause of action for libel, slander or other relevant tort and the action is not substantially justified. For purposes of this subsection, “substantially justified” means a proceeding that has a reasonable basis in law or fact at the time that it is initiated.

 

E. Nothing in this section limits any common law right of the person or entity.

 

F. Nothing in this section is intended to prohibit contact or communication with clients or patients for any lawful purpose, including communication by and between insurers, the insurers' policyholders and claimants under policies issued to the insurers' policyholders regarding the investigation or settlement of any claim.

 

G. For the purposes of this section:

 

1. “Runner”, “capper” or “steerer” means a person who procures clients at the direction of, or in cooperation with, a person who intends to perform or obtain services or benefits under a contract of insurance or who intends to assert a claim against an insured.

 

2. “Statement” includes any notice, proof of injury, bill for services, payment for services, hospital or doctor records, x-rays, test reports, medical or legal expenses, or other evidence of loss or injury, or other expense or payment.

 

A.R.S. § 20-463.01

 

A. It is an unlawful practice for a person who sells or repairs auto glass to knowingly:

 

1. Submit a false claim to an insurer for auto glass repair or replacement or for related services:

 

(a) If the services were not provided.

(b) Showing work performed in a geographical area that in fact was not the location where the services were provided and that results in a higher payment than would otherwise be paid to the person by the policyholder's insurer.

(c) Not authorized in writing by the owner or lessee of the vehicle.

(d) Showing work performed on a date other than the date the work was actually performed and resulting in a change of insurance coverage status.

 

2. Advise a policyholder to falsify the date of damage to the auto glass that results in a change of insurance coverage for repair or replacement of the auto glass.

 

3. Falsely sign on behalf of a policyholder or another person a work order, insurance assignment form or other related form in order to submit a claim to an insurer for auto glass repair or replacement or for related services.

 

4. Misrepresent to a policyholder or other person:

 

(a) The price of the proposed repairs or replacement being billed to the policyholder's insurer.

(b) That the insurer has approved the repairs or replacement unless the auto glass repair or replacement facility has verified coverage or obtained authorization directly from the insurance company or any other third party administrator contracted with the insurance company and the evidence has been confirmed by fax, e-mail or other written and recorded communication.

 

5. Represent to a policyholder or other person that the repair or replacement will be paid for entirely by the policyholder's insurer and at no cost to the policyholder unless the insurance coverage has been verified by a person who is employed by or is a producer contracted with the policyholder's insurer or is a third party administrator contracted with the insurer.

 

6. Add to the damage of auto glass before repair in order to increase the scope of repair or replacement or encourage a policyholder or other person to add to the damage of auto glass before repair.

 

7. Perform work clearly and substantially beyond the level of work necessary to repair or replace the auto glass to put the vehicle back into a safe pre-damaged condition in accordance with accepted or approved reasonable and customary glass repair or replacement techniques.

 

B. It is unlawful for a person who sells or repairs auto glass to intentionally misrepresent the relationship of the glass repair facility to the policyholder's insurer. For the purposes of determining whether a person intended the misrepresentation, it may be presumed that the person intended the misrepresentation if the person was engaged in a regular and consistent pattern of misrepresentation.

 

C. A violation of this section is subject to enforcement under this article.

 

D. For the purposes of determining whether a defendant knew of any particular element of the prohibited activity, it may be presumed that the person had knowledge if the person was engaged in a regular and consistent pattern of the prohibited activity.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis