Our homeowners insured (HO-3, 4/84 edition) suffered a theft loss over three months ago and has not yet received a check for his loss. The stolen items were tools in the amount of $4,400.
The insured made a police report; furnished the insurer with a list of the items taken; and replaced all of the items on his list, paying cash for everything. Copies of the receipts for replacement of the property were given to the adjuster. The adjuster has called several of the merchants to verify the purchases and has been told that the insured did replace the items and pay cash for them.
Now the adjuster wants the insured to furnish him with original bills, warranty cards, or service records to substantiate that the insured did own the items that were taken. Is not a Proof of Loss an adequate statement that he did have those items? Once the insured replaces the items, is not the company obligated to pay him for his loss?
Our insured is above reproach. We have personally known him for 20 years. Does the insurer have the right to not pay this claim until they receive copies of original bills, or a note from some of the merchants stating the insured has purchased items from them in the past?
Illinois Subscriber
The policy does require that the insurer make payment to the insured within sixty days after receiving proof and “reaching an agreement” with him. Apparently, the insurer thinks it has not reached an agreement with your client.
The proof of loss requires that the insured submit an inventory of the lost or damaged personal property. Attached to that inventory, the policy calls for “bills, receipts, and related documents that justify the figures in the inventory.”
We understand that the insured has submitted the receipts from his new purchases. However, what the policy requires is evidence that he owned the tools.
We also understand that, from a practical point of view, very few people save such evidence. Insurers are also aware of this fact and will usually work with a client and an agent to arrive at an equitable settlement.
As the insured's agent, you need to point out again to the insurer that your client is above reproach and your long-standing relationship with him. If that doesn't work, perhaps the insured's only recourse will be legal action or to contact the Department of Insurance. While it may seem a harsh position, the insurer is technically within its rights to withhold payment, because they have not “reach[ed] an agreement” with the client.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]