The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has affirmed a district court's decision in favor of an insurer, finding that an inadvertent omission of an exclusion endorsement created only the appearance of coverage and that the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's verdict in the policyholder's favor. The issue of the “appearance of coverage” is discussed in the “Focus” section in the June 2013 issue of the Insurance Coverage Law Report.
Read more (sub. req.).

