Application of Pair or Set Clause in the Flood Policy
February 12, 2013
If there is water damage to the lower cabinets but not to the upper cabinets does the pair and set clause provide coverage for replacement of the upper cabinets even though there was no direct damage from flood?
Texas Subscriber
The flood policy is very clear about paying for damaged property only; the pair and set clause reads as follows:
A. Pairs and Sets
In case of loss to an article that is part of a pair or set, we will have the option of paying you:
1. An amount equal to the cost of replacing the lost, damaged, or destroyed article, minus its depreciation;
or
2. The amount that represents the fair proportion of the total value of the pair or set that the lost, damaged, or destroyed article bears to the pair or set.
The policy pays for the damaged portion of the cabinets only, and not to replace the undamaged cabinets so that they match.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]