Additional Insured and Separate Policy Limits

The Minnesota Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether an additional insured was entitled to a separate limit of liability after the insurer had paid the policy limits for a claim made against the named insured. This case is St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth v. Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association, 2010 WL 2733326 (Minn.App.). Note that this opinion is designated as unpublished at this time.

 

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis